---

The nose is rather discrete and floral.
In the palate, this whisky is sweet and relatively simple, without complexity and the nose is confirmed.
The finish is rather short.
2005

---

The smell is relatively neutral, but not unpleasant. A certain lack of complexity. The typical hints of a Lowland, like freshness and cut grass are not present in this single malt. May be due to triple distillation...?
The pleasant taste leaves an feeling of incompleteness. The rather long finish is pleasant too.
A good whisky, but without the complexity which would make it a great whisky.
2003

---

A rather discrete and pleasant nose announces a pleasant taste.
The palate is discrete too, with some malt hints, mixed with a rather neutral taste which is difficult to describe (flower taste?), followed by a pleasant finish, which seemed to me to be shorter than during the first tasting. However, the rating and the conclusion are not amended: a good whisky.
2004

---

During the third tasting, a certain lack at diversity in the taste and a lack at surprise were predominant. A rather disappointing whisky, unless its evident qualities.
2004