---

A second tasting confirmed the first one. A great contrast between the perfumed nose and the flatter taste. All remarks from the first tasting are still in force.
2005

---

A floral nose dominated by the malted cereal, followed by a taste in the palate where malt domination remains, with some spicy hints (pepper). The same impressions are present in the finish too. This whisky is nice, but no more.
2006

---

The nose detects refined cut grass hints
The taste is a bit poor. It is not complex enough, and to much marked by cereals. An interesting whisky, however a little disappointing in regard to other malts from the same area. No trace of the taste explosion which characterizes much malts from Speyside.
The finish is too short, and memorizes the alcohol rather than the aromas. But it is a very interesting bottling.
2004